On Mon, July 31, 2006 6:43 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> This seems reasonable. Given paragraph 2 ("URL strategies etc") Not for
> the reasons I've omitted (and responded to separately). However, I
> still don't think this will scale the way router-based solutions can
> (already :-).
Users of mod_backhand (for httpd v1.3) would disagree, it's a similar
solution that has been around for years. The lb support in v2.x will
hopefully eventually allow users of mod_backhand to migrate to v2.x from
v1.3.
Regards,
Graham
--
