On Friday 25 August 2006 14:05, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'm +0 about it, but I agree that I'd like to see > the package 1st :) > > I've never been a fan of mod_define, seeing mod_macro (as > Jorge seems to think as well) as much more useful...
Agreed, mod_macro is *the* configuration module:-) > check > out some of my OLD Apache PPTs from the 1st ApacheCons ;) > My main issue with mod_define is that there always seemed to > be such potential for issues and conflicts, esp when you > have rewrite rules, etc... The argument in favour is that we do periodically get requests for variable interpolation in various directives. A general framework would have some value. But to be really useful, it'll have to deal with both config-time and request-time interpolation without confusing the hell out of the lusers. And probably other issues I haven't thought about. -- Nick Kew
