A separate branch *would* really be nice; as I've got my own changes to
mod_cache that I'm working on (support for "offline-browsing" caching,
if upstream servers aren't available + attempt to cache other normally
non-cachable content (POSTs, etc)). Regardless of whether it's fit to
be included in the normal distribution, it will save a lot of headache
in making sure I'm up-to-date with the rest of the development going on...
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Thu, September 14, 2006 11:17 am, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
To facilitate the merging of our large mod_disk_cache fixup I will
send small patches that fix various bugs so that they can be applied
incrementally to trunk with relevant discussion limited to those
patches and me not having to respin entire patchsets due to trivial
fixes to patches like this one.
+1.
This also makes it easier when more than one person is working on
patchsets to integrate both patches.
Yup. The situation seems to be complicated somewhat by Davi working on
the cache-thingies, and doing more than just poking around in the
mod_cache infrastructure...
However, it seems that we really should start merging stuff in a tree,
be it trunk or cache-dev or whatever, before we are sitting on two
hard-to-merge trees which both holds significant improvements.
As said, our stuff is stable in production (except for one bug that I
suspect is an apache/apr bug, more about that when/if we get to that
part) and transforms mod_disk_cache from unusable for us to performing
nicely with approx 90% cache hit rate when serving ftp.acc.umu.se,
ftp.gnome.org, se.releases/archive.ubuntu.com, releases.mozilla.org,
ftp.se.debian.org ...
/Nikke
