On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
On Thu, September 14, 2006 2:41 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Yup. The situation seems to be complicated somewhat by Davi working on
the cache-thingies, and doing more than just poking around in the
mod_cache infrastructure...
However, it seems that we really should start merging stuff in a tree,
be it trunk or cache-dev or whatever, before we are sitting on two
hard-to-merge trees which both holds significant improvements.
Small patches are easy to merge, easy to review, and unlikely to clash -
what I am keen to do is start finding all the small fixes in both your and
Davi's code, and see them all applied. Davi's patches are already
reasonably small - is it possible to break up your patch into discrete
bits as well?
That's my intention. I had hoped for my small patches to be applied to
trunk one by one as they come, fixing eventual objections patch by
patch instead of having to respin large patchsets that depends on
eachother. At least for the small obvious fixes this should be doable.
Ie, make small patch, submit for review/commit, fix/redo if needed. On
to next patch.
When there are more complex changes I'll probably have to do
multi-part patchsets, but I really want to avoid them since they're a
pain when it comes to rejections.
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read the docs. Wow, what a radical concept!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
