Paul Querna wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There is a lot of confusion where the users think that >> simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker >> attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie). >> >> I'm looking into adding functionality that actually >> does that and therefore avoiding this large and common >> misconception. > > I think we should support both methods. > > Yeah, in many cases, it would be easier if the LB could figure out the > stickysession for me.
Also adding different sticky session methods like add parameters to the url would be useful. It's not always possible to set cookies. Also sticky session based on client ip would be nice. Although that would probably mean that the server must keep track of the sessions. Bart > > -Paul > >
