Paul Querna wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Paul Querna wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: > >>> There is a lot of confusion where the users think that > >>> simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker > >>> attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie). > >>> > >>> I'm looking into adding functionality that actually > >>> does that and therefore avoiding this large and common > >>> misconception. > >> I think we should support both methods. > >> > >> Yeah, in many cases, it would be easier if the LB could figure out the > >> stickysession for me. > >> > > > > That's what I'm thinking, sort of like an 'autostickysession' attribute. > > We could even have it default to cookies but add something like > > 'autostickysession=url' to force URL rewriting and adding a tag > > to the end of the URL (for sites that don't like cookies).... > > I don't care about sites that don't like cookies, how about that :) >
Hey, I was being generous :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
