On 12/5/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
> I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
>
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
>
> A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
> but implementation of the original feature died. Before Sebastian
> Nohn's patch is revised to fit in with the subsequent changes, I'd
> like to confirm that nobody has a strong (veto) objection to the
> feature, and that those in favor clearly out number those against.
+1. Should be documented as "a bad idea" as Joshua notes in that
thread.
+1
Joshua.
