On 12/05/2006 07:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but >>> I don't see anything that looks like a veto. >>> >>> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/% >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >>> >>> A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved, >>> but implementation of the original feature died. Before Sebastian >>> Nohn's patch is revised to fit in with the subsequent changes, I'd >>> like to confirm that nobody has a strong (veto) objection to the >>> feature, and that those in favor clearly out number those against. >> >> >> +1. Should be documented as "a bad idea" as Joshua notes in that >> thread. >> > > +1 (with that condition)
+1 provided the condition above is true. What is the latest patch that should be applied? I just did a quick review of http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18775 and I think we should use the "long" version (aka ap_get_server_description()) in the output of mod_status and mod_info instead the possibly turned off version ap_get_server_description() Regards Rüdiger
