On 12/6/06, Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to Jeff:
> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
> I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
I voted -1 at that time which is a veto.
oops, I didn't read all your messages
--------------veto-----------
I fear that many users of Apache would actually turn off the
Server header for no or for the wrong reasons (which may "harm" our
market share), and therefore I'm -1 on including this patch.
--------------veto-----------
That sounds like the "web server with ego" argument. Is this going to
make much more difference than netcraft catching Apache hosting parked
domain names one month and IIS the next?
My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very
stupid idea to add a "feature" that allows our users to do
something which is stupid and absurd.
*shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea,
feel free to ignore my veto.
Retract the veto, or not.
