On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:02:12 -0700
Chris Darroch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nick Kew wrote:
> 
> > Thanks.  I've just reviewed both patches, and added them as an
> > attachment to PR#42327 and a proposal in STATUS.
> 
>    I apologize for joining this thread a little late.  I know it's
> more complicated, but I'm inclined to suggest trying to bring the more
> comprehensive trunk fixes into 2.2.x.
> 
>    First, can I suggest that PR #42327 be marked as a duplicate of
> PR #41302?  For many details, see this comment in particular, and its
> various references:
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41302#c1
> 
>    Trunk also includes a large number of other fixes, including those
> for PR #39985.  Both PR #39985 and PR #41302 have comments from
> their respective reporters indicating that the trunk version resolves
> their problems, and I think all three PRs could be closed as soon
> as backports are committed to 2.2.x.

I was wondering about that, but reluctant to propose a backport
from trunk without doing some more research.  If you want to make it
a backport proposal, I'll try and get my brain around it (and one or
two related issues) in the morning.

Anyone here using trunk mod_dbd operationally and have anything
to report?

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/

Reply via email to