On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:02:12 -0700 Chris Darroch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote: > > > Thanks. I've just reviewed both patches, and added them as an > > attachment to PR#42327 and a proposal in STATUS. > > I apologize for joining this thread a little late. I know it's > more complicated, but I'm inclined to suggest trying to bring the more > comprehensive trunk fixes into 2.2.x. > > First, can I suggest that PR #42327 be marked as a duplicate of > PR #41302? For many details, see this comment in particular, and its > various references: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41302#c1 > > Trunk also includes a large number of other fixes, including those > for PR #39985. Both PR #39985 and PR #41302 have comments from > their respective reporters indicating that the trunk version resolves > their problems, and I think all three PRs could be closed as soon > as backports are committed to 2.2.x. I was wondering about that, but reluctant to propose a backport from trunk without doing some more research. If you want to make it a backport proposal, I'll try and get my brain around it (and one or two related issues) in the morning. Anyone here using trunk mod_dbd operationally and have anything to report? -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/