On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:47:49PM -0500, Webmaster wrote: > Say whatever you want, I'm not going to argue when the evidence is online > for everyone to examine. Go look at the wiki at my posting history, you > will see how unfairly I have been treated.
I've done just that today, never having looked at it before. In my opinion, you have been treated fairly and have been given substantial leeway. > Why not respond like you are supposed to and actually SHOW me what is wrong, > misleading, or poorly written? You do not allow us to do so in the most efficient, convenient, accessible and collaborative manner - to edit them directly with comments. The people here are not free consultation for your personal website. > Isn't that what the wiki is for? How can we > improve content when it just gets deleted right away? I don't have time to > try to make a couple people like me.. thats silly, I go to the wiki to > contribute, share ideas, and learn about my favorite software. So why do you post so much "content" only in the form of links? you are mis-representing the problem here. -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
