On 25/06/07, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 08:47:03PM +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>> Yes, it is obviously an alternative, but FastCGI has its own sets of
>> quirks, and PHP under CGI too (as far as I know; I'm no PHP user).
> Quirks such as? Am not asking to dispute that there aren't any, just
> asking out of ignorance as to what they are so I can learn something.
I haven't been particularly involved with it at the local installation here,
but I've seen problems with FastCGI stuff hanging, not dealing well with
scripts leaking memory, and being difficult to set up. In general, it didn't
make people happy. (It may make other people very happy; people differ.)
And I have heard those complaints as well, but all that means is that
the implementation has problems not the actual concept of how it
works. :-)
Graham
