William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Dmitry Butskoy wrote: >> Samba team think that this code is not something Samba-related (see >> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-June/054186.html). >> Actually, it is Apache's httpd-related. Hence it have to be hosted >> somewhere in apache.org ... > > The issue with hosting at Apache, of course, is that nothing more restrictive > than the Apache License (BSD-style) could be applied. Fortunately, the list > of authors is rather short, in terms of appealing to them for a grant under > the Apache License. > > Yet and still, there is the minor issue that NTLM violates RFC2616, and as > such you might find resistance here :)
Actually, I'm confused :) Knowing Samba is GPL, overall, I'm not clear from the file headers that this is, in fact, collected as GPL or continues to be Apache Licensed/less restrictive? c.f. http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/trunk/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.c?rev=713&content-type=text%2Fplain&root=lorikeet Bill
