William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Samba team think that this code is not something Samba-related (see
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-June/054186.html).
Actually, it is Apache's httpd-related. Hence it have to be hosted
somewhere in apache.org ...
The issue with hosting at Apache, of course, is that nothing more restrictive
than the Apache License (BSD-style) could be applied. Fortunately, the list
of authors is rather short, in terms of appealing to them for a grant under
the Apache License.
Yet and still, there is the minor issue that NTLM violates RFC2616, and as
such you might find resistance here :)
Actually, I'm confused :) Knowing Samba is GPL, overall, I'm not clear from
the file headers that this is, in fact, collected as GPL or continues to be
Apache Licensed/less restrictive?
Certainly, it is Apache Licensed.
Not GPL.
People, who start with this module, surely know about license
compatibility, therefore this module is Apache licensed.
Regards,
Dmitry Butskoy
