On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
Any opinions on this?
Here's a version with a config directive, defaults to disabled.
Silly Q; a directive? Or a env var that can be scoped in interesting
ways using mod_setenvif and/or mod_rewrite?
Most of our proxy behavior overrides are in terms of envvars. They are
much more flexible to being tuned per-browser, per-backend etc.
Directive, envvar, I don't think Niklas cares much. Can we make up our
mind please?
I have no clue on the envvar-stuff, so I don't think I'm qualified to have an
opinion. CacheIgnoreCacheControl et al are config directives currently and I
have the gut feeling that they should all either be envvar-thingies or config
directives, and that starting to mix stuff will only end in confusion and
despair ;)
I prefer a config-option that I can set serverwide without too much fuss
since we want this behaviour on all files. If this can also be accomplished
with envvar-stuff then sure.
One way might be to do a config directive for now, and deal with the
envvar-stuff separately.
Related, this config option might also be of interest for mod_disk_cache to
enable similar optimizations. What would the "good" way be to accomplish
this?
/Nikke
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, what was that magic word? Shazam? <WHAM!> Nah - Garibaldi
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
