On 09/26/2007 07:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> In the current log.c code, although the write-end of an initial error
> logger is still held by the parent --- until the second logger process
> has kicked off.  It seems someone's inherited that write end.  I have
> a two line patch attached that

Funny. Two people getting to the same patch independently :-). So
yes, I think your patch does the correct thing.

> 
> Needs some review before we kick off 2.2.7 into the real world, since
> we close that write end of the logger right after we've launched the
> logger.  Wondering if this might not be a prefork, worker or event mpm
> specific failure case.

I don't think so.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to