Graham Leggett wrote: > On Wed, November 14, 2007 10:35 am, Paul Querna wrote: > > >> That you currently need a patch to serf/trunk to add the pluggable event >> loop. Hopefully we can fix that out tomorrow by adding it or some >> derivative to serf trunk. >> > > This could potentially become a recurring theme. > > Adding the ability for httpd modules to make http client calls is a very > useful addition, and as has been suggested already, mod_serf is the most > obvious contender for the job for extending services to the rest of the > server. > > But if what httpd asks of serf deviates so far from the standard serf > library that we need to fork our own version of serf, then we will start > having all sorts of problems. > > We need to keep this in mind if serf is set to be so tightly integrated > with the core. > > Well, not to overstate the obvious, but aren't we implying here that serf will become an integral part of apr-util (at least that's what I'd understood)? As such, serf wouldn't be forked as much as absorbed...
Issac
