Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 9:07 AM, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, not to overstate the obvious, but aren't we implying here that >> serf will become an integral part of apr-util (at least that's what I'd >> understood)? As such, serf wouldn't be forked as much as absorbed... > > IMO, serf is and should be a standalone library. -- justin
Under (or not) the Apache umbrella? -- Davi Arnaut
