Now that I am really back, I'd like to reboot the intent to T&R all three. 2.2 has a current show-stopper however, with a veto upon the patch by Nick.
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Guenter Knauf
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Jim Jagielski
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Steffen
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Werner Baumann
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Nick Kew
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Werner Baumann
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Nick Kew
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Jim Jagielski
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Nick Kew
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ? Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2... William A. Rowe, Jr.