Hi Ruediger, > 1. Why using AP_DECLARE for functions that seem to be clearly used as > functions > local to this file. IMHO static int would be better. > 2. Why using an ap_ prefix for a local function? IMHO only exported > function > should get this prefix. Otherwise you might get confused reading the > code > by assuming that these functions get exported.
> BTW: This comment is valid for all session stuff. from what I see mod_session does indeed export at least these: ap_hook_session_decode ap_hook_session_encode ap_hook_session_load ap_hook_session_save and f.e. mod_session_crypt does then consume them; on NetWare I need to manually control these exports / imports and tell them to the linker. Guenter.
