On 06/05/2008 06:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/05/2008 06:00 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
apr-util-1.3 lets us link httpd (and support/) in such a way as to avoid
all ldap entanglements.
Any thoughts on adopting
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/httpd-2.2-ldap.patch
for the coming release? If built static, do we already merge up all
those
LDADD flags, or is there some magic we need to add to accomplish that?
As I would not like to see 2.2.9 already *dependent* on apr / apr-util
1.3.x
(only shipped with apr / apr-util 1.3.x) I propose to do this only on
trunk
and postpone backporting to the point of time where we make 2.2.x
dependent
on 1.3.x which IMHO depends on the real live quality of 1.3.x. So if
it is
good, it may be 2.2.10 which becomes dependent on 1.3.x.
Note the "||" syntax of this patch, which dodges this "feature" of
apr-util-1.3 and remains compatible with apr-util-1.2.x
Does this change your opinion?
Yes, this changes my opinion. So I am +1 for this patch. Just add it
to the STATUS file and lets see if we get the missing vote.
The patch for trunk should drop that toggle and simply fix at apr 1.3.
Seen that. +1.
Regards
Rüdiger
