On Jun 5, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/05/2008 06:00 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
apr-util-1.3 lets us link httpd (and support/) in such a way as to
avoid
all ldap entanglements.
Any thoughts on adopting
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/httpd-2.2-ldap.patch
for the coming release? If built static, do we already merge up
all those
LDADD flags, or is there some magic we need to add to accomplish
that?
As I would not like to see 2.2.9 already *dependent* on apr / apr-
util 1.3.x
(only shipped with apr / apr-util 1.3.x) I propose to do this only
on trunk
and postpone backporting to the point of time where we make 2.2.x
dependent
on 1.3.x which IMHO depends on the real live quality of 1.3.x. So if
it is
good, it may be 2.2.10 which becomes dependent on 1.3.x.
Hmmm... I don't see the patch as requiring 1.3.x...
What am I missing?
