On 9/25/08 9:37 PM, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Couple of points, API fn name sucks, can it be ap_request_config_test(r,feat)?
Sure. > Always request-rec based, there should be no need for server rec (two args > are faster than 3). True. > About your other idea, it's a no-go. For the record, it was Paul's idea to add a const char* arg... We need to do something or users - including ourselves - will do the very bad thing of declaring CORE_PRIVATE all over the place. -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer Turner Digital Media Technologies
