On Sep 29, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Akins, Brian wrote:
On 9/25/08 9:37 PM, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Couple of points, API fn name sucks, can it be
ap_request_config_test(r,feat)?
Sure.
Always request-rec based, there should be no need for server rec
(two args
are faster than 3).
True.
About your other idea, it's a no-go.
For the record, it was Paul's idea to add a const char* arg...
We need to do something or users - including ourselves - will do the
very
bad thing of declaring CORE_PRIVATE all over the place.
+1...
