> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Ruediger Pluem > Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Oktober 2008 15:18 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: SSL toolkit detection in acinclude.m4 > > > > On 10/16/2008 12:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> While investigating PR46018 I came across the following in > acinclude.m4 > >> > >> dnl Run header and version checks > >> saved_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" > >> saved_LIBS="$LIBS" > >> if test "x$ap_ssltk_base" != "x"; then > >> APR_ADDTO(CPPFLAGS, [-I$ap_ssltk_base/include]) > >> APR_ADDTO(INCLUDES, [-I$ap_ssltk_base/include]) > >> APR_ADDTO(LDFLAGS, [-L$ap_ssltk_base/lib]) > >> > >> > >> Is there any reason why we only save / restore CPPFLAGS > and LIBS and > >> not INCLUDES and LDFLAGS which are also modified? > >> > >> The next thing I don't get is why we do not add > `$apr_config --libs` > >> to LIBS > >> any longer (since r669924). This causes -ldl to miss and thus the > >> checks to fail > >> (I guess only if there is no pkgconfig file). > > > > Yes, I ran into a similar issue, when compiling 2.2.10 > against static > > openssl libs on Solaris, having no pkgconfig. Then you need > to add -ldl, > > -lnsl, -lsocket during the configure tests, because > otherwise tehy fail. > > That was not necessary until 2.2.9. > > Any further comments, ideas how to fix this?
I added a possible fix to the PR (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22826). Does somebody mind checking if this is the correct thing to do? Regards Rüdiger
