> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Poirier > Sent: Montag, 21. September 2009 17:28 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DAV Provider Patch > > "Brian J. France" <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > >> Brian J. France wrote: > >> > >>> I believe this is the first patch that will break binary > >>> compatibility > >>> because it adds a function pointer to the middle of the struct. I > >>> believe binary compatibility could be retained if we add > the function > >>> pointers to the end of the struct instead of in the > middle. Moving > >>> the > >>> function could be part of the back porting patch to 2.2, but leave > >>> it as > >>> is in 2.3+. > >> > >> Would it be possible to move the function pointers to the > end of the > >> struct for httpd-trunk as well? Breaking binary > compatibility is to be > >> avoided if it can be, even on trunk. > > > > > > Sure. Which method would be preferred? Having two hooks > or just one > > and use the request_rec to get the filename? > > As long as the filename can be gotten trivially from the request rec, > I'd say keep things simple and just add the one hook.
+1. Regards Rüdiger
