Jim Jagielski wrote: > Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume > head of apr 1.4...
-1 veto; that is not released code, and I'm not fond of the idea of a fork of apr managed at httpd. But if you meant, you will be moving forwards in apr to have that group accept an apr 1.4.0 release, by all means, httpd should follow suit.
