On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Planning on pushing this out to coincide w/ ACUS09... Let's assume
head of apr 1.4...
-1 veto; that is not released code, and I'm not fond of the idea of
a fork
of apr managed at httpd.
Who said anything about 'apr managed at httpd'?? All I said is that
we should assume that 2.3.3-a will be released with a baseline of
apr 1.4 and using the current head as the starting point. Obviously
we aren't releasing with unreleased apr...
But if you meant, you will be moving forwards in apr to have that
group accept
an apr 1.4.0 release, by all means, httpd should follow suit.
Bingo.
