On 21 Dec 2009, at 07:22, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Why bytes_handled - 1 and not bytes_handled?
Terminating null. (we know the last byte actually handled was LF because we got a line-end). -- Nick Kew
On 21 Dec 2009, at 07:22, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Why bytes_handled - 1 and not bytes_handled?
Terminating null. (we know the last byte actually handled was LF because we got a line-end). -- Nick Kew