Res wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >>> Speaking from the community that provides end-user support for these >>> products, a big +1 on that proposal. >>> >> Sadly, questions will keep on showing up for a long time :( > > I agree, however if it is EOL'd (yes Jeff, I agree this is likely more > of an appropriate term :) ) you more or less can advise the requestor > they are using a very old and unsupported version and that they should > use the current stable version 2.2.xx
These questions aren't a bother on an established 1.3 server, we all have to support legacy systems. What is frightening is the number of users who are clearly deploying their httpd server with 1.3, for the first time, and trying to learn that. Almost want to suggest to them that they go take a community college class on COBOL while they are at it, since they are clearly trying to improve their technical knowledge. Heh