On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > Speaking from the community that provides end-user support for these > products, a big +1 on that proposal. > Sadly, questions will keep on showing up for a long time :(
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Noirin Shirley <noi...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Colm MacCárthaigh <c...@allcosts.net> writes: >> >>> Because ... stealing an idea from wrowe@ ... how about we formally >>> deprecate the 1.3.x branch? Make one more release, but attach a notice >>> to the effect that it will be the final release, and that in future >>> we'll be distributing security updates by other means :-) > > +1! Yes please :-) > +1 (non-binding) There are still to many questions about the 1.3 branch on the support channels IMHO >> >> While we're at it, how about issuing a statement regarding how much >> longer 2.0.x will be supported? It doesn't seem to get much maintenance >> attention these days either. > > Also +1 > +1 (non-binding) > N >
