On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Sat Feb 20 15:08:29 2010 > New Revision: 912124 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912124&view=rev > Log: > * Promote > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=912124&r1=912123&r2=912124&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Feb 20 15:08:29 2010 > @@ -87,7 +87,20 @@ > PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] > > - > + * mod_authnz_ldap: Add AuthLDAPBindAuthoritative to allow other > authentication > + providers a chance to run when mod_authnz_ldap finds a user but can't > + verify their password. PR46608. > + Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881808&view=rev > + doc: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=881812 > + 2.2.x patch: > http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.2.x-ldap_bind_authoritative.diff > + 2.2.x doc : > http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.2.x-ldap_bind_authoritative-doc.diff > + (resolves loglevel conflict introduced after the trunk > commit) > + +1: covener, pgollucci > + rpluem says: I am +1 once you provide proper documentation for the manual > + covener says: doc revision added above > + minfrin says: The trunk patches no longer apply clean, is it possible to > + create a v2.2. patch? > + covener: resolved conflict
Ruediger, do I need a more explicit vote in STATUS here? (might be pedantic since it was for the doc) -- Eric Covener [email protected]
