On 20.02.2010 16:38, Eric Covener wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:08 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: rpluem >> Date: Sat Feb 20 15:08:29 2010 >> New Revision: 912124 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=912124&view=rev >> Log: >> * Promote >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=912124&r1=912123&r2=912124&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Feb 20 15:08:29 2010 >> @@ -87,7 +87,20 @@ >> PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] >> >> - >> + * mod_authnz_ldap: Add AuthLDAPBindAuthoritative to allow other >> authentication >> + providers a chance to run when mod_authnz_ldap finds a user but can't >> + verify their password. PR46608. >> + Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881808&view=rev >> + doc: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=881812 >> + 2.2.x patch: >> http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.2.x-ldap_bind_authoritative.diff >> + 2.2.x doc : >> http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.2.x-ldap_bind_authoritative-doc.diff >> + (resolves loglevel conflict introduced after the trunk >> commit) >> + +1: covener, pgollucci >> + rpluem says: I am +1 once you provide proper documentation for the >> manual >> + covener says: doc revision added above >> + minfrin says: The trunk patches no longer apply clean, is it possible to >> + create a v2.2. patch? >> + covener: resolved conflict > > Ruediger, do I need a more explicit vote in STATUS here? (might be > pedantic since it was for the doc) >
I said I am +1 once documentation is in place. It is now in place so I am +1. Regards Rüdiger
