On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[email protected]> wrote: > I am confused. Why is this a good idea? Why is it unexpected to > encounter a 413 response after a timeout due to a read of chunked > body,
The body is not too large, and the server is not rejecting the body due to size. Isn't 413 a very misleading status? > and how does changing it to a 400 somehow prevent a double > errordoc? Why not just fix the double errordoc bug instead of > the case that triggers it? This was the secondary part to me, but I'll open a bug with an example (IIUC, filter that adds an error bucket but then also returns a (non-http) error). -- Eric Covener [email protected]
