On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am confused. Why is this a good idea? Why is it unexpected to >>> encounter a 413 response after a timeout due to a read of chunked >>> body, >> >> The body is not too large, and the server is not rejecting the body >> due to size. Isn't 413 a very misleading status? > > Er, yeah, 413 is wrong -- I should have looked it up. It should be > a 408 (Request Timeout).
400->408 in r938265. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
