On 4/26/2010 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> >>>> For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what >>>> are you using? >> >> You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on >> a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. >> >> Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development >> against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? >> >> [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) >> [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree >> [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat >> [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre >> [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] > > The latter seems impossible for OS-provisioned apr, does it not?
You mean, that apr 1.4 (not apr-util 1.4) is a prerequisite? Its true that few vendors are likely to be shipping apr 1.4.2 yet.
