On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 4/26/2010 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>>> On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what >>>>> are you using? >>> >>> You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on >>> a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches. >>> >>> Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development >>> against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)? >>> >>> [X] ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc) >>> [ ] ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree >>> [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat >>> [X] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre >>> [ ] configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util] >> >> The latter seems impossible for OS-provisioned apr, does it not? > > You mean, that apr 1.4 (not apr-util 1.4) is a prerequisite? Its true that > few > vendors are likely to be shipping apr 1.4.2 yet. >
Yes.
