On 5/18/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On 17 May 2010, at 20:13, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> BETTER SUGGESTIONS? > > I never quite understood our AllowOverride being set in stone, > and many times I've felt that using any of the existing ones for a new > function was a grotty hack. OTOH it doesn't really scale to adding > new options ad lib. > > Reading this and Graham's followup, I wonder if we should introduce > a single new option, something like "auto", for the semantics of > what you're doing? Exact behaviour would be to turn on/off the > check Graham suggests or similar, on top of some other option.
What about requiring AllowOverride All for this case?
