On 5/18/2010 1:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/18/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >> >> On 17 May 2010, at 20:13, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> BETTER SUGGESTIONS? >> >> I never quite understood our AllowOverride being set in stone, >> and many times I've felt that using any of the existing ones for a new >> function was a grotty hack. OTOH it doesn't really scale to adding >> new options ad lib. >> >> Reading this and Graham's followup, I wonder if we should introduce >> a single new option, something like "auto", for the semantics of >> what you're doing? Exact behaviour would be to turn on/off the >> check Graham suggests or similar, on top of some other option. > > What about requiring AllowOverride All for this case?
Another specific option would be some extensible keyword registration al la Mutex.
