The message "worker ... already used by another worker" seems to not say
what's actually happening.
Situation:
ProxyPass /X http://a.b.c.d/A
ProxyPass /Y http://a.b.c.d/AB
Wouldn't a message
worker "http://a.b.c.d/A"; will also be used for URL "/Y"
be more correct?
In addition: we do overwrite the worker config (additional attributes)
when parsing the second ProxyPass. Should we add a message
Merging configuration for worker "http://a.b.c.d/A";
Finally: I guess we need to document the behaviour, especially that you
have the option to reuse/overwrite or use separate workers, depending on
the order of the ProxyPass statements.
Any opinion?
Regards,
Rainer
