On Thursday 30 September 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 30.09.2010 10:24, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 September 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> >> On 9/29/2010 6:49 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> >>> Am 30.09.2010 01:17, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
> >>>> a touch would probably do ... - if not I will face same for
> >>>> NetWare ...
> >>>
> >>> just checked, and beside some new prototype warnings:
> >>> Compiling ssl_expr_scan.c
> >>> ### mwccnlm Compiler:
> >>> # File: ssl_expr_scan.c
> >>> # ------------------------
> >>> # 2066: {
> >>> # Warning: ^
> >>> # function has no prototype
> >>> ### mwccnlm Compiler:
> >>> # 2142: {
> >>> # Warning: ^
> >>> # function has no prototype
> >
> > No, those are the ones I mentioned in the commit log. They appear
> > with gcc, too:
> >
> > ssl_expr_scan.c:2065: warning: no previous prototype for
> > 'ssl_expr_yyget_column'
> > ssl_expr_scan.c:2141: warning: no previous prototype for
> > 'ssl_expr_yyset_column'
> >
> > If someone has a the latest Fedora and can regenerate the file,
> > that would probably fix it. Otherwise it will have to wait until
> > the fixed flex is in Debian, I am too lazy to install a new flex
> > from source for just too warnings.
>
> Do you have a pointer to the flex source code you want to be used?
> I build the toolchain for myself on Solaris, so I can easily
> update from 2.5.35 to some custom version to do this test.
That would be nice. There is no official release, yet, but this bug
report has a patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3029024&group_id=97492&atid=618177
(I have read somewhere that Fedora has included the patch)
