On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > ... and assume overlaps are intentional opt-in to name-based vhosts? > > The selection algorithm would not change, meaning you'd still only be > selecting from the best ip-based match. > > We'd lose the warning about overlapping vhosts, and maybe incur some > overhead on mapping a vhost that was unintentionally showing up > multiple times. > > Just kicking the idea around since NVH seems to be tough for users to grok.
+1. Makes sense. -- Dan Poirier <[email protected]>
