I believe also that wrowe mentioned to me that we wanted to support command line (make) builds, and VC9 doesn't allow us to export makefiles.
I'm +1 for making both VC6 and VC9 builds from 2.4 and on, like PHP does. Issac On 31/01/2011 11:21, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > Hi > > If I remember correctly wrowe said it was because a lot of 3rd party > modules use VC6. > Although that was a while ago so I could be wrong. > > If I'm indeed correct maybe 2.4 is a good time to switch to VC9? > > ~Jorge > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I'm a php developer, and I'm using VC9 php builds on windows(PHP 5.3 doesn't >> support ), hence I'm using the apache httpd builds from apachelounge.com, >> because you guys only offer VC6 windows builds, and I'm too lazy to build >> myself. >> My question is: why is this the case? as far as I can tell, the project >> builds fine with VC9, so why don't you support the VC9 builds? >> I would prefer the official builds for VC9, if that would be an option. >> If I missed something obvious there, then please bear with me, I tried to >> find the answer in the windows section of the download page, the wiki, and >> the mailing lists, but without much luck. >> >> Tyrael >>
