Re: 2.2 approach for byterange?

[Jim Jagielski]

On Aug 27, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Eric Covener wrote:

> lots of threads.  Trying to resynch here, not a vote.
> 
> For 2.2:
> 
> [  ] everything in 2.3 (brigade_copy, mergeing, validation, ???)
> [ X] just the cheap brigade copy + sum_len > clen failsafe
> [  ] above + default/configurable limit on num ranges
> [  ] just a default/configurable limit on numranges