Thx!! On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Greg Ames wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > Could I get at least 1 more binding vote…?? > > > yep. +1 > > Greg
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Eric Covener
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Steffen
- RE: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Greg Ames
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Greg Ames
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Jim Jagielski
- RE: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... William A. Rowe Jr.
- [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] ht... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... William A. Rowe Jr.
- RE: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.2... William A. Rowe Jr.
- Re: 2.2 approach for byterange? Jim Jagielski
- Re: 2.2 approach for byterange? Greg Ames
- Re: 2.2 approach for byterange? Jim Jagielski
