On 9/19/2011 12:55 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 09/17/2011 06:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> > Author: druggeri
>> > Date: Sat Sep 17 16:25:17 2011
>> > New Revision: 1172010
>> > 
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1172010&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Log better information and prevent leak of an X509 structure for 
>> > SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile
>> > 
>> > Modified:
>> >     httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
>> > 
>> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
>> > URL: 
>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c?rev=1172010&r1=1172009&r2=1172010&view=diff
>> > ==============================================================================
>> > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c (original)
>> > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c Sat Sep 17 16:25:17 
>> > 2011
>> > @@ -1181,21 +1181,57 @@ static void ssl_init_proxy_certs(server_
>> >      X509_STORE_load_locations(store, pkp->ca_cert_file, NULL);
>> >  
>> >      for (n = 0; n < ncerts; n++) {
>> > -        int i;
>> > +        int i, res;
>> > +        char cert_cn[256];
>> > +
>> >          X509_INFO *inf = sk_X509_INFO_value(pkp->certs, n);
>> > +        X509_NAME *name = X509_get_subject_name(inf->x509);
>> > +        X509_NAME_oneline(name, cert_cn, sizeof(cert_cn));
>> >          X509_STORE_CTX_init(sctx, store, inf->x509, NULL);
>> > -        X509_verify_cert(sctx);
>> > -        ERR_clear_error();
>> >  
>> > +        res=X509_verify_cert(sctx);
> Style violation.
>
>> >          chain = X509_STORE_CTX_get1_chain(sctx);
>> > -        sk_X509_shift(chain);
>> > +
>> > +        if (res == 1) {
>> > +            /* Removing the client cert if verification is OK
>> > +             * could save a loop when choosing which cert to send
>> > +             * when more than one is available */
>> > +            /* XXX: This is not needed if we collapse the two
>> > +             * checks in ssl_engine_kernel in the future */
>> > +            X509_free(sk_X509_shift(chain));
>> > +        }
>> > +        else {
>> > +            int n=X509_STORE_CTX_get_error(sctx);
> Overwriting a symbol from the loop is IMHO bad and makes code hard to read. 
> Please use
> another name instead of n. Besides we have a style violation here again.
>
>
>> > +            ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, 0, s,
>> > +                         "SSL proxy client cert chain verification failed 
>> > for %s: %s",
>> > +                         cert_cn, X509_verify_cert_error_string(n));
>> > +        }
>> > +        ERR_clear_error();
>> >          i=sk_X509_num(chain);
>> >          pkp->ca_certs[n] = chain;
>> > +
>> > +        if (i == 0 || (res != 1 && i == 1) ) {
>> > +            /* zero or only the client cert won't be very useful
>> > +             * due to verification failure */
>> > +            sk_X509_pop_free(chain, X509_free);
>> > +            i = 0;
>> > +            pkp->ca_certs[n] = NULL;
>> > +        }
>> > +         
>> >          X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup(sctx);
>> >  
>> >          ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s,
>> > -                     "client certificate %i has loaded %i "
>> > -                     "intermediate CA%s", n, i, i == 1 ? "" : "s");
>> > +                     "loaded %i intermediate CA%s for cert %i (%s)",
>> > +                     i, i == 1 ? "" : "s", n, cert_cn);
>> > +        if (i > 0) {
>> > +            int j;
>> > +            for (j=0; j<i; j++) {
>> > +                char ca_cn[256];
>> > +                X509_NAME *ca_name = 
>> > X509_get_subject_name(sk_X509_value(chain, j));
>> > +                X509_NAME_oneline(ca_name, ca_cn, sizeof(ca_cn));
>> > +                ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, s, "%i: %s", j, 
>> > ca_cn);
>> > +            }
>> > +        }
>> >      }
>> >  
>> >      X509_STORE_CTX_free(sctx);
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>

Thank you. Fixed in r1172562.

-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

Reply via email to