On 9/28/2011 1:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Author: kbrand
> Date: Wed Sep 28 06:34:33 2011
> New Revision: 1176749
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176749&view=rev
> Log:
> vote/comment
>
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1176749&r1=1176748&r2=1176749&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Sep 28 06:34:33 2011
> @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>      2.2.x patch: 
> http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/patches/httpd-2.2-SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile.patch
>      +0 covener: needs r1162103 && needs druggeri's vote?
>      +1: druggeri
> +    kbrand: +1 (non-binding) with the following fixes applied: indentation of
> +            the "if (ca_cert_chains)" line, ca_certs assignment (5 lines 
> below)
> +            changed as in r1162103, and in ssl_toolkit_compat.h, omit
> +            sk_X509_new_null and remove "(st)" from the sk_X509_shift define
>  
>    * mod_cache: * Do not cache 206 responses in any case since we currently 
> do not provide any
>      backends that are capable to cache partial responses. PR 49113.
>
>

Sorry for not getting to this sooner. You will find the patch at
http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/patches/httpd-2.2-SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile.patch
has been updated today to reflect this. Please have a look when you can.

-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

Reply via email to