nonbinding +1 for it being bundled. That makes life a tad easier in various environments where I have to configure mod_proxy...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12.10.2011 23:56, Nick Kew wrote: >> >> On 10 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Nick Kew wrote: >> >>> Any interest? >> >> Looks like a lazy consensus in favour! > > If you ant it a bit less lazy: +1 from me also. > >> Regarding IP, it's mine to sign over, so that's straightforward. >> So I guess it's just a matter of going through the administrivia: >> - create the subproject in svn >> - relicense >> - produce documentation in our format >> - write a README >> - what have I missed that needs to happen up-front? >> >> I'm laptop-bound now and for another week, so the hurdle to action >> is higher than it would normally be. So I'll leave that time for any >> objections before attempting to do anything. In practice that means >> target date for action is the weekend of Oct 22/23. > > I had the impression Jim was +1 for bundling in 2.4, and you are > planning it as a separate module like mod_ftp or mod_fcgid. > > I'm neutral on whether to bundle or not. We would need to handle the > dependecies like for some other module when bundling, i.e. disabling the > build if the deps are not found. > > Regards, > > Rainer > >
