> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Kew [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2011 10:45
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: mod_proxy_html
> 
> On 14 Oct 2011, at 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
> > I think I prefer it in 2.4 than in a separate module.
> 
> OK, there seem to be a few folks saying that.
> 
> If we include it in 2.4 then we're making libxml2 a dependency.

I don't think that this is a real issue. As said we need to check this
dependency and prevent building it if the dependency is not there.
I guess things like lua are even more special as libxml2 and
mod_lua is included in httpd as well.

> That's of concern primarily to packagers, but it's a decision
> we should at least take consciously.  That's why my initial
> proposal made it a separate module!
> 
> Adding libxml2 could also open the way to bundling some
> other great modules, such as XSLT transformations.

But only if we make it a module independent dependency.

> 
> (note: it is now possible to use libxml2 as the the backend
> for APR's XML module, though expat remains the default there).

IMHO that would create an APR dependency and not primarily a httpd dependency.
So this should be discussed over at dev@apr and is IMHO unrelated to this
topic.

Regards

Rüdiger

Reply via email to