On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Greg Ames <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If we include it in 2.4 then we're making libxml2 a dependency. >> That's of concern primarily to packagers, > > I doubt that I could find libxml2 for z/OS. I vote for keeping it a > separate module.
http://xmlsoft.org/news.html " build fixes: Cygwin portability fixes (Gerrit P. Haase), calling convention problems on Windows (Marcus Boerger), cleanups based on Linus' sparse tool, update of win32/configure.js (Rob Richards), remove warnings on Windows(Marcus Boerger), compilation without SAX1, detection of the Python binary, use $GCC inestad of $CC = 'gcc' (Andrew W. Nosenko), compilation/link with threads and old gcc, compile problem by C370 on Z/OS, " By google, It appears as if it has been compiled before on z/OS > >> >> but it's a decision >> we should at least take consciously. That's why my initial >> proposal made it a separate module! > > Greg >
